Technical News and Views from a hole in the ground: 2006
Time Line 2006: page edited: Friday, October 16, 2009
Time Line Base
January 6th., 2006: New Year, same problems. Eventually, HP sent me a pdf relating to the storage tower, a Compaq ProLiant 3092, that I picked up for a song from Retro Computers. It is a hot plug SCSI based piece dating from 1998. Neat if I can find drives with trays, and then have it work as my main storage repository. It took a while for HP to find the file, so, should you need it, here it is. The 3092 should easily connect to one of my two Compaq ProLiant 800 machines. It will take most drives, including Fast-Wide SCSI-2, even high speed later types, assuming the drive cage is compatible. I have been looking for 18.2 and 36.4GB refurbished items. Not that I can afford them yet; there exists an Excel file detailing all of the updates, extras and such that I need. Especially important is finding a P4, with a suitable video card, that will enable me to use Google Earth, and to add my two 40GB spares to its storage capacity.
This is an interesting photograph, especially since I am a friend of the great-nephew of this man, William Manchester. His memoir of his experiences in the Pacific WWII arena is tremendous. That he can be so easily criticized for other work is, to me, an insult to a fine man and a great biographer. I had held this opinion prior to meeting Geoff, his relative, by reading Manchester's books on Krupp and Churchill. Goodbye, Darkness is horrific and hilarious by turn, and bears reading, especially with regard to the machinations of the Pentagon today and yesterday. The blame for Pearl Harbor is properly assigned to the naval high command. In this month is news that the Pentagon could have supplied better body armour to their troops in Iraq, but thought it not worthwhile. As if they didn't believe that the war is honourable, one wonders.
|This evening, waiting for FP to
download at 2Kbps again, I have moved some parts
around with a view to making my computers work more efficiently.
The working ProLiant 800 server now has all six drives placed on one of its native SCSI buses. I had had one, the boot drive, running on an Adaptec 2940UW, but decided to move that card to Oxford, the white box that I use for internet access. One reason was that running a couple of drives on the Adaptec card caused a problem for the drive I use for programme downloads, an 18.2GB SCSI. Hardware failure warnings arose, and sometimes the machine locked. Having to do a hard reset caused the RAID 5 array to regenerate each time. Putting all of the drives on the SymBios 875XSJD native adapter has so far proven the proper course to take.
I took two Compaq drives, nominal 9.1GB SCSI Ultra3, from the
stack being held for my other 800 (I shall hunt for Ultra3 SCSI 36.4GB drives
for that machine). These were put on the AHA2940 68-pin internal
connector, and now that Ghost has performed its magic, they have replaced
the older 50-pin drives that were in the box. One of the older, an 8.4GB SCSI-2 drive, has
been moved to my HP PA-RISC pizza box, ready for a Debian
installation, now that I have downloaded the network ISO and burnt
it to CD. All I need now is an external SCSI CD-ROM, and then we'll
see how that will run.
January 8th., 2006: MyHosting, which, as its name states, hosts sites, hosts mine. All three of them. All three are currently run under MS Windows Server 2003, and the web server used is Microsoft, IIS/6.0. My periodic problems with downloading my sites to my own network resurfaced. I had not downloaded them since the change from NetNation to MyHosting last year: when one is using dial-up it can't be done in a reasonable time.
Now that my internet connection is 3Mb/sec adsl, and I have a great deal to upload and change on my sites, I thought that I should check downloading rates again. I found that they were slow once more, even if, that is, I was comparing by date stamp and not by file changes. I use FrontPage 2003 (Office 11) SP2, and regularly check for updates and apply them. Everything should work properly, hein?
Emailing MyHosting via my management page at their site, I discovered that Microsoft put out a fix more than a month ago. The techie couldn't find the link, and I have made three requests for it. Here is a Windows Server page at MS about IIS 6.0 and so forth: complex indeed.
Now then, the rates were improved on each of my sites, and that's fine, but what is the fix, and why won't they tell me, and why can't I find it on a Support search on the MS site? Does it change security levels? It is a registry fix, I do know that. It is, therefore, a real bug, and although the techie said it was a recognised intermittent problem, well, it occurred on all three of my domains, so it can't be that rare. Googling shows that a lot of people have had the same problem.
January 9th., 2006: Well, it would seem I was correct about the Promise Ultra 100tx2 being the source of Rutland seizing frequently. I inserted an Adaptec AHA2940AU in its place: added a small SCSI-2 hard drive and connected the ScanJet IIc to it. Scanner works fine, and the hard drive runs smoothly. And, it hasn't seized. So, don't use a Promise card if you can avoid it. Especially since it uses an EZ-drive, whatever that might be. At the very least it prevents Partition Magic from working.
I was on the MyHosting chat with us over the internet support line: type your question into a box, etc. It appears that there is a bug in FrontPage on the server side, on the hosting server. Something to do with server extensions, IIS that is, and Windows Server 2003. The problem is accepted by Microsoft, and there is a hot fix, but it has not been disseminated. There is a line in the registry that fixes the slow download problem, but what the bug actually is hasn't been properly explained to me. Searching on the Microsoft site proves fruitless. Too much time wasted, because one doesn't know which parameters to use.
January 14th., 2006: At last, a reasonable reason for the download of sites to computers on my network. MyHosting technical support finally sent me a link to this MS page: Event ID 1000 warning messages are logged on the server each time that you perform an authoring action on a Web site. It is somewhat laughable, however, that the associated link on the page one reaches about FrontPage Server Extensions does not exist! Oh, well, at least an answer, for which I am grateful. I have posted this information on a couple of sites, just for information purposes. People should be made aware that their problems may have a real cause, hein?
And, one should recognize that this fix is simply not permanent. The download problem has not disappeared, and it seems ridiculous to inform technical support every time that it occurs. The rate has slowed when I simply added today's data, from a recent 18-20KBps to 6-8KBps today. Rats!
January 16th., 2006: Strange that even though I changed the video card to a newer ATi Rage XL, and downloaded and installed new drivers, the ProLiant 800 still freezes periodically. Event viewer showed that there was a problem with the older ATi card and I hoped this change would stop that. To no avail, and hard reboot causes yet another rebuild of the RAID-5 array. It appears to happen under FireFox, and not when using IE. This is a dual-processor machine, and maybe that has something to do with it, too. Who knows?
January 24th., 2006: Not all NICs work faultlessly. I was wondering why this machine frequently lost contact with the Web. I had to constantly check the diagnostics of the switch, thinking that it was dropping the connection. When I checked the other machines connected to the Web, it was revealed that there was something else wrong. They were always connected. So, I swapped the NICs in this machine, Oxford. The 3Com was made the local network NIC, and the NetGear became the DHCP NIC, with nothing but TCP/IP enabled. Voila, everything works as advertised.
At least, now that we have a Thatcher clone elected in Canada, I can be glad that my internet connection is cured and I can pursue the idiocies of this new Prime Minister. His underwear is fundamentalist, and his outerwear and glowering mien show the pressure this brings.
January 26th., 2006: Is it the dual processor, or is it something else? If I use FireFox 1.5 or IE 6+ then after a while I close the programmes and that does nothing. But if I reopen them then the computer, the ProLiant 800, seizes solid, permanently. Then it is necessary to press the power switch, and after reboot to wait whilst the RAID-5 regenerates. Every bloody time. The FireFox browser expects to send error reports, but it can't if it can't remember what happened. I wonder if it is related to Java applets or Macromedia stuff on certain sites. Probably the latter. Whatever it is I can't determine the cause because there is no way to gracefully restart the machine.
January 29th., 2006: Of course, it was very silly to try and send an error report to Adobe about the ProLiant seizing up by using the ProLiant. The page about Macromedia Flash Player was, itself, running flash, so there was a blue screen of death as I tried to complete the entries. I went to another machine to input a report as I waited for the ProLiant to reboot and regenerate. There were errors relating to event viewer messages that arose because of this, for which see the images above. Not particularly useful, at least for me, since they are somewhat cryptic.
Consequently, when things had quietened down, the machine was gracefully restarted. I have heard that an acquaintance's Intergraph box is constantly crashing. It too is a dual processor, PII, box. Perhaps for the same reasons? But he's the fool who persists in using internet messaging, so who knows?
January 30th., 2006: Thinking about this constant problem with my oldish, but still eminently usable, ProLiant, I wonder if I shall hear about more and more disasters with the increasingly more numerous sales of dual processor and dual-core processor based computers. Given, for one example, that HP sells a dual-core AMD based media PC, then anyone buying one and finding Macromedia Flash screws up their surfing will be irate. I do hope that I hear from Adobe soon, with a cure.
February 3rd., 2006: It may be that my problem with seizing/blue screen on Gloucester has been cured. Macromedia/Adobe sent me an email (I have corrected the grammatical error, slight as it may have been):
Should problems persist, try the following steps:
Test if Flash works, by going tohttp://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/welcome
Hope that helps.
Now then, it wasn't quite as simple as that, given where the root directory on Gloucester actually lies. But, it was simple enough to find and to delete the folder. Then, when I clicked the link in the email, it took me to the file to download and allowed me to install the saved Active X executable.
When I had finished installation, I went to the Flash test page, whereupon I was asked if I wanted to download the latest version, which is 10.1 or similar. I had wondered why the test graphics hadn't appeared before this offering appeared. So, having agreed, it started to install, and also asked me to add Yahoo's tool bar, which I declined.
Finally, having finished the installation, I went to a couple of sites, including Adobe and Macromedia, both of which use Flash, and, so far, nothing untoward has happened. Time will tell.
March 18th., 2006: Nothing helps if one fails to read the instructions. Well, in this case, it doesn't work because it's not an Ultra2/3 SCSI drive, but an Ultra160. The machine I was upgrading kept telling me that the disk had failed, and no wonder. Since it was the second ProLiant 800 that I have, and I was bringing it up to workable condition, I wanted an 18GB boot drive. The used drive I bought was, I thought, suitable. Not so, because I never read the label underneath it.
The computer is, however, working now, with somewhat less RAM than I expected. I had thought I had obtained another box, for cannibalistic purposes, that had all of the necessary parts. It had one 256MB and one 64MB, not the two 256MB DIMMs I had been told it contained. Also, with the 18GB drive proving unworkable (the Ultra160), there were only four 9.1GB Ultra2 10k spinners available for use. Therefore, unlike the other ProLiant 800, I used JBOD, not RAID-5. But, it works well enough and will become another AD box when I feel up to it. RAM and another drive will be added when I can find the money and the pieces.
March 25th., 2006: Hunting for another monitor, given that one of my main 21"beasties is starting to give horizontal "tearing" which is indicative of capacitors wearing out in its power supply. I think I'll go down to a 17", because if it takes 1600x1200 that's all I need. I have that setting on a 17" attached to one of my ProLiant 800s, and that works fine. Only $25 second-hand at Retro. And I found another Ultra160 drive. I will have to find a proper adapter now.
April 7th., 2006: Today, in London, or wherever she may be, my elder daughter reaches 35. There was a comedy skit about that by someone, quite a long time ago, and I've been trying to remember the source. Something like, "thirty-five years" in a long, low growl. No idea how Sarah feels at this stage of her life. I do know that she was in India recently, and had a revealing time there.
Now, back to work. my sole Compaq DeskPro EN has been problematic. Signs of the monitor failing and occasional seizing of the system. I had had an Adaptec 2940AU inserted, to cope with my ScanJet IIc and an attendant small SCSI hard drive. The wires for the hard drive had to be routed via a shallow groove on a part of the frame. This meant that when rolling on the side panel, it grabbed the signal/power cable and put pressure on the connectors. Result meant I had to lean the side panel against the computer. Not clever, given what transpired. Yesterday evening, I took an unused Adaptec 2906 in another IBM box, and replaced the SCSI adapter in the EN. I also placed the hard drive in an external box. Sorting out the cables and ensuring the terminator was on the correct connector has enabled me to screw on the side panel. Everything is now running quite well. The heating is normal, and the monitor seems, at this stage, to have stopped producing horizontal streaming of text and such.
May 10th., 2006: Watched the UEFA Cup game.
Sevilla winners by 4-0 over Middlesbrough. Thrashed unmercifully,
even if the referee should have given the losers a clear penalty
when it could have mattered.
Here is the answer to a clue in a recent Guardian
Weekly crossword written by Paul (not me): The Arnolfini Portrait,
1434, Jan van Eyck:
June 5th., 2006: Monday before the Friday that starts the games for WC2006. The Ultra160 drives that I had were placed in a server and now work. One of the drives was unusable, and I was able to exchange it after going through a few machines at Retro. Now, I have two 18.2GB 10K drives: one of them runs the OS: Win2kAS SP4 + Roll Up. Nice and smooth and enables me to work on other machines now that one has six drives of decent size. I am not a gamer, or someone who downloads movies, so I don't need space for those items: merely for web pages and text. And the databases.
June 6th., 2006: Of course, the credulous idiots are claiming that today is the day of Satan: a combination of 6 and 6 and 6. As if the calendar was accurate. How many times has it been changed, and which calendar of which culture is to be recognised? And, when was, in the Christian world, the actual birth? Back to reality: what a difference having the correct Ultra160 cable makes. The SCSI BIOS woke up with 160 instead of 40, which was the megabyte rate prior to installing the twisted cable. Nice to see how things move along now.
July 1st., 2006: England knocked out of the
FIFA World Cup, by two horrendous decisions: one by the referee, one
by the now unemployable England incompetent manager. Not that the
result was exactly unexpected. Also, Brasil was knocked out by
France. Huzza!! Zidane and pals were excellent and nice to watch.
Unlike the English penalty kick twerps. Only one scored by England
was the previously unacknowledged Owen Hargreaves, who had a
Now then: Retro Computer has come almost good again. Brian, the owner, told me that the hot-swap drives in a Dell PowerEdge 2400 should fit in my IBM x220. Not so, they were out by about a thirtysecondth of an inch. However, after playing with the placing of the drives in the hot swap cage on the 2400, I attached an Ultra160 capable cable to the backplane and to the other two Ultra 160 drives I took from a ProLiant 800. This gave all of the drives in the machine the nominal 160MB/s transfer rate. It really made a difference when using the computer at all times.
The reason I had to rearrange the drives in the cage was the ordering of the SCSI buses on start up. These were altered when I updated the BIOS and the motherboard firmware. The IDs on the hot-swap drive cage are numbered. Thus, ID0 took control for the boot device for the Win2kAS start up. This was not desired since the Adaptec 29160N was attached to the OS drive on ID0, and ID1 was given to the other Ultra 160 drive. So, to have it all work with the current setup, I moved the two hot-swap drives in the bays marked ID0 and ID1 to the empty bays ID4 and ID5. Then, when I booted up the machine, the IDs were properly allocated for all six Ultra 160 drives. Took me a time to sort it out, and I learned something about having multiple SCSI controllers in one machine. This will have to be watched whenever I install a RAID adapter.
As I have mentioned, I'm looking for an Adaptec Ultra 160 RAID card. If this proves possible to obtain cheaply, then I can attach the four Ultra 160 hot-swap drives to it and convert them to RAID 5. This will make them truly hot-swappable, which can't be done with the Adaptec 29160n card that they're attached to at the moment. And, with the RAID card, I can find two more drives to fill the bay and create more storage.
The other thing is that the IBM x220 now has a 133MHz cable connection for the two 40GB AT drives. They now work at the proper connection rate. Took me a while to sort out the positioning of the cables in the machine: snakepit.
July 2nd., 2006: Every time I start up the Dell PowerEdge 2400, but only after I updated the BIOS, etc., (and installed SP4 Rollup and all the other stuff that is required) I receive a new hardware message. This is for the Dell 1x6 backplane on the AIC-7890 onboard SCSI. The hardware is installed and, as the second image shows, is working properly. This is a pain, and searching Dell is fruitless, as is the Windows 2000 support on Microsoft's site.
Above are the two relevant images, click to enlarge. The first shows the start up screen after logging onto the computer. The second shows the properties page for the device. It states it is working properly. Well, it has to be, otherwise the machine wouldn't be working, would it? Daft situation, but I can't cure it so far. Dell has a DPA04.exe producing an .inf file that is supposed to remove the yellow query in hardware. It does not succeed. There are pages in Microsoft support relating to unsigned drivers, but no real help, even using sigverif, in the Resource Kit. Whatever, it is minor, but distracting.
July 3rd., 2006: Apropos the Dell 1x6 backplane: one thing the hardware tells me is that there is an Adaptec AHA-2940U2/U2W in the computer!! Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP4 + Roll Up, plus all the other stuff that updates produce. It should be an Adaptec AIC-7880. This after the updating of the Adaptec drivers, too. No wonder the installation bug arises. Something doesn't know what it should be doing.
But, something has just occurred to me. Given that the backplane is there, that the drives are attached to it, but that the Adaptec 29160N has the cable attachment and not the motherboard, perhaps if I reattached the drives to that the error would disappear. That could be the answer because the BIOS would then be loaded, which it currently is not for the Adaptec AIC-7890 that held the hot-swap drives in the original state. Not likely, however, that I shall bother if I obtain a RAID adapter. I'd rather do that than mess with the on-board RAID, which needs a key that I don't have anyway.
July 24th., 2006: Odd date, just that it means I am 64 and one third years old. So, one wonders, how does one gain employment in these semi-ageist times?
Now then, anything that happens when one watches the Tour de France is astonishing, at times. Floyd Landis won after the most amazing recovery of anyone's memory to regain prominence and the ultimate yellow jersey in Paris last Sunday. Brilliant and nerve-wracking at once.
Computers: the Dell 2400 now has an Adaptec 3200s RAID card. It, too, now that I have updated all of the SMOR, BIOS, NVRAM oddments, shows the 1x6 backplane working, but not installed, even if it is, when Windows starts. Never mind, everything works, and the RAID card has improved the computer. Having turned off the booting option, when I find two more hot-swap drives they can be installed and the RAID-5 setting expanded. Later, later. Compared with another machine, which is using Win2k software for the RAID set up in disk management, not a card, the Adaptec 3200s works instantly. No re-reading of the drives as happens at every start up for the other machine.
Retro Computer should have more SCSI based machines for sale soon. A friend, who has helped me obtain a few goodies from eBay, wants me to reserve him a rack-based computer, should one appear at the store. I might follow his lead, because it would enable me to sort out the space in my cell, and make things more efficient. Money is tight, of course. Additionally, the government bureaucracy is slow in mailing out GST refunds this quarter. After telling me I was late in submitting my return, which was not true, and then stating that they were overworked (!), I eventually received the cheque. I went after cashing it to complete the payments owing for my eBay purchases: Starbucks old chubby ceramic mugs and the Adaptec 3200s.
August 2nd., 2006: Yesterday, after having swapped an inadequate 3Com switch for an external, slow SCSI-2 Yamaha CD writer, I tried installing it into the Dell 2400. The installed SCSI card, an Adaptec 2920, would not show the device, whatever I tried. So, I took the chance and added it to the daisy chain on Oxford, which has an Adaptec 2940UW. This worked straightaway, after ensuring no ID conflict. Odd, what? Will try to move it to the next server I acquire. Thankfully, it runs and it works. Speed is not everything.
August 8th., 2006: It would be better to pay attention to what is written on the labels of my hard drives. What I have done in the past few hours is swap drives in two of my ProLiant 800 boxes. I found, because I was searching the web for information, that some of the drives I had thought were Wide Ultra 2 SCSI, were in fact Ultra160 items. This meant that I firstly rearranged the Dell box and removed an Adaptec 29160n card. I placed all of the drives on the two internal connections on the Adaptec 3200s RAID card. After ticking the boot up allowed configuration box, this allowed the Dell PowerEdge to start up and run as smoothly as ever.
Then, the drives in the ProLiants were arranged: Gloucester now has six Wide Ultra 2 drives, all 9.1GB, four in a RAID 5 disposition, and all running at 10k. Then, I placed all of the Ultra160 drives in Antrim, attached to the Adaptec 29160n card. The Dell's drives run at 160MB/s, as they damn well should, and so should the Antrim drives.
A problem with my Office 11 installation on Gloucester was cured by remembering to alter the drive letter. The drive I took out was set as D: and I had installed its smaller replacement and forgot to check the drive letter, which was C:. Once that was rectified, the normal Tuesday update of security and other matters from MS, was done successfully.
August 10th., 2006: What I discovered with Antrim is that the Compaq BIOS hides the SCSI Ctr-A option screen. That's no good: I therefore trotted down to my storage and recovered four 9.1GB Wide Ultra 2 drives. These I placed in Antrim after removing all four of the Ultra160 drives. Just a few adjustments and most things work as they should. Now I have 5 Ultra160 drives to place in the next server I find. That will be one to replace one of my aging Intel PII 350 boxes. One is the AD box, and is working satisfactorily: but only because the load on it is minor. Few machines for it to bother with currently.
August 30th., 2006: Interesting stuff lately, if you're interested. It started off with an XP Pro upgrade to Oxford, my W2kPro box. It worked in a way, except that I couldn't use Windows Update. I had straightaway activated the machine. I then, because there was nothing in the Networking applet, the icons in the quick start bar failed to appear, and other things on the computer, tried all of the tricks offered by Microsoft to allow me to do the update. Nothing worked concerning update rights. So, I tried re-installing/repairing XP Pro SP2. That for some reason cancelled the activation, which now failed every time I tried it.
Next, I tried the activation tips on Daniel
Petri's site, with registry tweaks et al. Nada, nada, nada and then I
decided to use the activation screen, phone option. It produced a set of
numbers. I phoned the offered number and spoke with a robot which
told me I had what appeared to be an improper installation. I then
was passed to a guy in India.
Eventually, after I had told him about the snafu, he gave me a set of numbers, and voilà, the machine is
validated, once again. After a reboot, I still could not run update. So, I
go to another page on MS, concerning users. Following the
instructions, I check my users status, and, which is what I should have done
in the first place, ensured that the administrator was included. All
updates to other computers, non-XP, had never produced this
situation. My normal user name and status had been downgraded to debugger.
Yes, a real Microsoft user name, not what I am, so there!!
Continuing the computer discussion: this is the page that cured
the update problem on the XP Pro box: there were no proper
When I rebooted, it was a different ball game: all of the icons appeared, the networking applet was filled with the proper NICs, and Windows update worked. Did it ever, there were about 60MB of downloads to cope with. Having done that and found that everything sort of worked, I went to use Outlook and found it totally non-responsive, and also giving errors. So did a lot of other programmes.
The cause was simple, and I'll tell you now what it was, in case you have no SCSI interests. The cause of all problems was simply a rabbit-eared connector being a tiny bit loose on one of my external SCSI drives.
Firstly, I put in two more SCSI Ultra 2 Wide drives to try and increase the usable space by spanning them. Errors galore, glacially slow copying. So much so that I removed them and used one as the temp and swap space drive on another server. Next, Outlook still buggy and slow, and every time I had to reboot as things were updated, one of the drives was repeatedly check-disked. I lost some data, and nothing was working as well under XP Pro SP2 as it had under Win2kPro SP4. Recently, I had obtained a cheap external SCSI Yamaha CD-RW. This had stopped working and was removed from the chain because the Adaptec start up would hang. I should have known right then what the error was.
I had found that trying to install the Recovery Console stopped with the statement that the computer held newer files than the XP Pro share folder. This seemed wrong to me, so I downloaded XP SP2 and, after expanding into a folder, slip-streamed the XP Pro share. Then, I ran Recovery Console install and the operation caused an immediate check with MS and the downloading of newer files into the share. This means that the Recovery Console is up to date at this time. Neat, indeed.
Then I found the loose connection, because I wanted to add a CD-RW to another machine and thought I would reuse the Yamaha CD-RW to see if it would work on a different adapter. The cable from the Yamaha to the external hard-drive box was fractionally loose. After a week's work, I should have checked my cables prior to this: it almost certainly happened when I had moved another server which had had the Yamaha drive sitting on its top. I installed the Yamaha in a machine with an Adaptec 2906 card and it worked straight away.
I then found that my main internet machine was working far quicker. Outlook has started to work as fast as it did before, and I have errors reaching sites due to rapidity rather than slowness. The drives all seem healthy, and the racket I was worried about, caused by searching on the SCSI internal drives, is back to its own usual level.
A few of the links I have found useful lately have been Sysinternals, Daniel Petri and a couple of others. These quotes, taken from recent emails I sent to friends, should clarify this:
a) This page has downloadable floppy and CD boot disks. For when you need them, they seem to work well. I used the XP Power Toys ISO creator (noted from this page: http://www.petri.co.il/customize_a_new_xp_installation.htm ) to make the boot CD from the downloaded boot file. After all, many of the latest computers don’t have floppy drives: http://www.onecomputerguy.com/install/floppies.htm
b) The source of the Whois file is found here: http://www.sysinternals.com/NetworkingUtilities.html where there are several other neat utilities.
c) This page has a link to downloadable boot sector for XP and instructions to make a bootable CD: http://old.bink.nu/xpbootcd/ This site is also linked to Petri’s slipstreaming for Win2000/XP page.
Now, it's computer moving time in my cell. I need extra space, so I am having to move certain boxes around to make a better arrangement. We'll see. I will try installing an extra spare SCSI drive into Oxford once more, just to see if everything works as it should.
August 30th., 2006: The moving of computers, boxes, books and odds and ends proved successful. More efficient use of space, and less of a need to slip sideways around projections in the cell.
September 3rd., 2006:
Root kit problem has arisen. I visited SysInternals again to see
if there was an update to their free RootKit Revealer. There
was and, after downloading, I ran it. The problem on this XP Pro
SP2 box is shown in the jpeg that opens if clicked.
One nice thing is that NCF (Ottawa: National Capital Freenet, http://ncf.ca ) has upgraded their DSL offering to 5Mbps from 3Mbps at no extra charge. Great news, and it has made a difference. I tested my connection using http://speakeasy.net/speedtest and it came back with a download rate from Ottawa to Chicago of 3962kbps and an upload of 628kbps. Given I'm at an unknown distance from the distribution point, this is still an excellent rate for Can$30 and change.
September 7th., 2006: What it is to have downloaded EasyPHP1-8 and installed it on one computer with no attendant problems: to use with an O'Reilly book. Then, to use a SAMS book, I downloaded the latest standard versions of MySQL, Apache and PHP 5.1.6. The latter gave me a few hours of trouble. Following the instructions to the letter prevented Apache from running, always with an error on the PHP line. Read, follow instructions, fail, follow instructions. Repeat and fail. Eventually, I googled "Apache 2.x.x cannot load phpapache2.dll". Should have done that earlier. I found that I should have downloaded the experimental PHP and copied over the phpapache2_2.dll to the PHP folder. I did that, and immediately everything worked.
What would have been possible without a search engine? Probably impossible to cure, since the PHP site does not, at this date, have the fix elucidated.
One other hardware fix done, too: Ferret, a Wide Ultra 2 SCSI drive has been giving chkdsk errors on boot up on the main email machine. Checking after that and finding that it was deemed healthy, I copied all of the folders to another drive. Eventually, after a format and a reboot, I renamed the other drive to Ferret, and spanned what was Ferret with another drive, Eland. Gives more space to Eland, and they are similar drives, so that should cure the problems for a while.
September 18th., 2006: The day that Maher Arar is cleared by the O'Connor report, censored though it is. About time that was cleared up, and the compensation for him, his family, and others that have been improperly tortured or otherwise dealt with, distributed in quick time.
Now, Crucial have a scanning executable, to determine what and what would be available regarding a computer's RAM. Odd results on a couple of my computers: one gives ECC where none is; one states maximum of 384MB is usable, when that computer already runs 768MB; one cannot be read at all, even though the model is on their list. This scanning tool is one I am going to use on several computers I need to repair and upgrade for friends/acquaintances. Two are Dell boxes with front-end bus differences and two optional clock speeds for RAM: and the system does not tell one which has which.
October 18th., 2006: Three different installations of PHP, MySQL and Apache on three differing computers. Using Julie Meloni's SAMS Teach Yourself, edition 1, the first few examples in the chapters worked on all machines. Suddenly, upon reaching more complicated scenarios, the main self-learning machine failed to load any example. This is the one that had the latest software, that I downloaded and installed, and then set them up to talk to each other. The other two machines run XAMPP and EasyPHP 1.8 respectively. Not until I discovered that at http://thickbook.com there were the examples available from the latest editions, was I able to run them. Correlating the different scripts, I discovered that mysqli was the reason. I had used that in preference to the basic mysql as required in the configuration instructions. The latest scripts include mysqli, so everything has quietened down. The older scripts run on the other two machines, since they use older versions, 4x, of PHP, etc.
I won't insult others I have dealt with lately: there have been some ridiculous problems due to people simply not thinking about what they were doing. With regard to computing that is, not to do with transporting goods on passenger filled airplanes without having secured them, or of purloining body parts from the elder dead and selling them to unsuspecting hospitals.
November 6th., 2006: I obtained an ML570 server recently. It is heavy, and well built, but at first it wouldn't boot up. Taking every processor out, blowing on each of them to remove lint, and doing the same for the banks of memory seemed to cure the cryptic error messages. I wrote them down, laboriously, in case I needed them later: thank goodness I didn't.
Also, plugging in both of the power supplies stopped the other rtfm problem. So, now it has Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP4 and updates installed. When I mention updates, I mean 142MB on the initial scan. These were for the OS and for Office. It proved how well my dsl connection works: it did not take long, even though the installation of the updates failed in several instances, and required another go at it. That worked successfully, and the machine is ticking along nicely with only two Ultra160 36.4GB drives installed attached to an Adaptec 29160n that I placed in one of the hot swap PCI slots.
There is a need to find an Ultra320 version for any of those I can find. That's because there is room for a dozen hot swap drives in this quad PIII Xeon 900MHz beastie. It will take Ultra320 drives which would run at their native speed if the proper adapter is running things.
This image shows that having a 32 bit machine precludes the use of all of the memory installed, which is 5.120GB. There are three matched sets of memory, one of 1028MB and two of 2048MB. The latter cannot be placed in the first four slots, according to Kingston, who provided the extra RAM.
I am gradually clearing out my older machines, or more correctly I am ejecting the slower PII boxes I have. This is being written using one of them, simply because it's handy to work on. However, it won't take the latest Nero CD/DVD writing programme without a hiccough, and it has too many small drives and too little memory to work well without constant reboots to clear things up a little.
It is running XP Pro SP2, which works quite well. I will
try to move the boot drive to a faster machine and attempt to
reactivate XPPro if that is required: the usual robot/Asiatic Indian
scenario may be required. Painful to realise that Microsoft,
common with other concerns, goes where the labour is cheapest.
How, one wonders, do the worker ants in the US buy their SUVs
and mansions that ensure their energy usage is maintaining its
November 28th., 2006: Once I had updated the BIOS to match what I'd done with another of the four ProLiant 800 ancient but good servers that inhabit my cell, I discovered that it wouldn't start. Disc error, etc., occurred. Necessitated opening the beast and rearranging the SCSI cards, because now that one of them was recognised by the BIOS when it hadn't been previously, it found itself first in the queue. Placing the Adaptec 29160n into a lower numbered slot cured that silly problem. But, now that the BIOS had been updated, and all of the drives recognised, I was able thereafter to have Ahead Nero work on the SCSI rewritable drive. Little things mean a lot.
Apropos that final statement, I had my younger daughter visit me a week ago. She tells me that in her school in Montréal she has been asked if the Holocaust is real. What? Mon dieu, these bloody ignorant Catholic twits yet, in their anti-semitic fogs, able to disseminate garbage to the young. Lets hope that my elder daughter has better luck with her progeny, now that the prospect of my grandfatherhood rapidly approacheth.
December 13th., 2006: Yesterday, I was at Ottawa Congress Centre for the Microsoft Ready for a New Day exposé of Vista, Forefront, Exchange 2007 and Office 2007. Very interesting, although it forced my damaged hip to seeming pieces, very painful, a result of the usual uncomfortable seating. I was there for well over nine hours, but most of the speakers were entertaining and informative. One thing that was clearly apparent: over 50% of the speakers were obese. Do not a techie be, methinks. Poor food, long hours, sitting in a chair will lead to this modern day scourge.
One thing that one of the main presenters said,
is that he quite likes IE7. Well, so do I, but with it's use
with XP Pro SP2, it will not complete a custom update. This is
the error that appears, and is one which is not present when
using IE6 on my other', Windows 2000 Server, boxes. I am wrong,
it happens on one of my Win2kAS boxes, but not on any others.
One of the main presenters was Michael Treacy, a Canadian of Irish parentage, who was an MIT professor, and is still based in Boston, but who now hires people from around the world with his Gen3 company. He has a main pool of scientists working out of that den of democratic iniquity, St Petersburg, in Russia. Cheap but good labour. Mr Treacy was to me one of the better speakers, with an excellent, mature patter. He spoke about the misunderstanding of the relative numbers of outsourced workers in the US, and how the David Ricardo statement about comparative advantage refers to the modern world equally well now as it did when first promulgated. Fascinating stuff to bookworms such as I. Here is a pdf that includes some of the slides that he used in his presentation. It might state confidential, but it was available on his website?! One other thing: no email to him is accepted, it is always returned by my server stating cannot complete operation. Not user friendly, what?